Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on pocket
Share on email

Part II: Think like a startup! Applying a formal ecosystem framework to mature business sectors

Contributed by:
Dr. William Benton, Ph.D.
Business Ecosystems
This is the second of a multi-part series being introduced to help mature businesses and industry sectors who may be struggling to find ways to reimagine their businesses. (View Part I)
 
Interested in keeping up with updates? Sign up to receive blog notifications by email.
With the rapid fall and winter escalation of COVID-19 and the ongoing economic downturn, entire industry sectors are in disarray. As an effective vaccine makes its way into the arms of the world, it still may be some time before the impact of such a vaccine will be felt on the confidence of consumers and resulting positive impact on the economy.
 
Taking a wait-and-see approach is by no means effective and does nothing to ensure a sustained, durable, and long-lasting recovery – especially with new market forces on the horizon.
 
In response to data and research gathered by The Rocket Factory, we’re introducing the concept of intentional and methodical ecosystem-building to solve the very hard and very real challenges faced by mature sectors of the economy.
What is this whole ecosystem thing, anyway and why is it important to create acceleration?
 
By now, you’ve probably heard of business ecosystems, maybe someone has confidently announced that you’re part of one.
 
For many firms, this is about as far as the concept goes. For startups, ecosystems are crucial, because new firms tend not to have a lot of internal resources.
 
In mature industries, the concept may seem less crucial.
 
We believe that there is real power in understanding and acting at the sector ecosystem level of complexity.
 
But first, what are we talking about, exactly?
 
In business thinking, the term ecosystem is often used to describe many arrangements of firms, but a few are particularly salient in understanding how mature sectors can be transformed: Hub and Spoke, Distributed Network, and Bucket, to name a few commonly found models.
 
This often leads to the suspicion that ‘ecosystem’ is more of a faddish buzzword than a useful concept.
 
Breaking down what the different models are will give a sense of the larger domain that they capture. It will also show how a genuine and robust ecosystem can help everyone who takes part in building and maintaining it.
 
  • Hub and Spoke: A central firm that can formally or informally direct contractors, is only an ecosystem so long as there’s a limit on how many contractors are out there for each specific demand the hub firm has on the firms it deals with.

    The relationship of Apple’s App Store to individual app studios is close to this model, having a central platform on which many app development studios sell their products allows Apple to set terms for an entire industry. Apple is technically dependent on the thousands of studios whose products they put in front of iPhone users, but there is no comparable degree of organization between a trillion-dollar corporation and thousands of dispersed development studios.

    In this model, the actual dynamics of an ecosystem are weak, which is ultimately damaging to both the hub and all the edge nodes. Epic Games’ current lawsuits against Google and Apple on the claim that their sales channel restrictions are unfair may change this relationship, but as it stands, there is real power in the sales platform.

  • Distributed Network: Includes resources being committed in complex patterns with lateral feedback, is probably the closest thing to an ecosystem as found in nature.

    The Italian textile, clothing manufacture, and design industry is an example of this, with many competing and collaborating firms all working with common up-chain and down-chain providers.

    These relationships are often described as a “cluster” but as this describes both coordinated and non-coordinated firm groups, there is a meaningful distinction to be made between the two types of organization.

  • Bucket: When there are many competing firms offering the same services, with little coordination on common resource arrangements, there is real potential to grow a more robust set of connections, often across sectors.

    Food and beverage, for instance, is a global industry, but at the level of a metro region typically has a tremendous number of largely uncoordinated owner-operated restaurants.

    Individual restaurateurs might know each other, and most might have contracts with the same national restaurant equipment and supply providers (like Sysco), but there is neither hierarchy nor coordination between these firms. Like the Hub and Spoke, the “Bucket” has great potential to grow into a dynamic ecosystem, but it takes coordination between individual firms.

Each of these has distinct opportunities and challenges, as we will explore in Part III (coming soon).
 
The Hub and Spoke model needs engagement thresholds and caps with a focus on problems, Distributed Network needs clarity of interface, and Bucket needs networking and agenda-setting.

 

Check out Part I: Think like a startup! (and 4 other things to help save your business in 2021)

Reimagine™ by The Rocket Factory

Get help creating a pivot.